OSNews: http://www.osnews.com/story/18381/Report_Google_Shows_Phone_Prototype_to_Vendors Exploring the Future of Computing en-us Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams adam+nospam@osnews.com Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:08:20 GMT http://www.osnews.com/images/osnews.gif OSNews.com http://www.osnews.com hmm http://osnews.com/thread?260463 http://osnews.com/thread?260463 for some reason the mock up in the second article looks like its running windows mobile. Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:19:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (broken_symlink) Comments RE: hmm http://osnews.com/thread?260466 http://osnews.com/thread?260466 That's why it's just a mockup. ;) Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:23:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia) Comments JavaFX Mobile? http://osnews.com/thread?260481 http://osnews.com/thread?260481 Sun are pretty close with Google, I wonder whether they will use JavaFX Mobile as their platform...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaFX_Mobile Fri, 03 Aug 2007 00:13:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (chekr) Comments Advertisement before a call. http://osnews.com/thread?260486 http://osnews.com/thread?260486 Wow novel concept. I would love that.
Imagine getting a Pizza add just before dialing Dominos.

Or getting an add for a lawyer, just before calling your wife ;) .
The possibilities are limitless. Fri, 03 Aug 2007 00:51:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (abhaysahai) Comments Providers? http://osnews.com/thread?260490 http://osnews.com/thread?260490 Given that current providers are charging a rather large amount for internet access on phones, I'm wondering how well Google having all its applications be online is going to work... Unless Google is going to also offer the internet access discounted by ads, and leave the carrier to manage the phone end of things. Fri, 03 Aug 2007 01:18:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (DigitalAxis) Comments free email, why not free voice http://osnews.com/thread?260492 http://osnews.com/thread?260492 Most of use have use and expect email services to be free, very few of us actually pay for personal email use. Someone else has to pay for email servers, bandwidth and storage.

I guess if anyone has the guts to extend this to voice (overIP), it has to be Google. Kudos to them.

(just don't mention the privacy concerns) Fri, 03 Aug 2007 01:20:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (project_2501) Comments RE: Advertisement before a call. http://osnews.com/thread?260506 http://osnews.com/thread?260506 The interesting part will be exactly how Google chooses to integrate the ads. Remember, there were essentially two keys to Google's astonishing success as an advertising firm: targeted and unobtrusive.

First, the smartphone is a unique opportunity for data collection. People communicate their thoughts, emotions, preferences, intentions, and social ties through their phone. Especially with advanced voice recognition technology, a smartphone-based advertising platform could know almost all there is to know about the user. The privacy issues are obvious, but that's another comment.

Google does impressively well with targeted ads using predominantly your search query as input. Imagine how well they could do with all of your emails, messages, and conversations? The phone could come to know you as a personal (consumer) assistant, suggesting all manner of products and services appropriate for the time, place, and context. Oh, it's lunchtime and there's a new Mexican restaurant right around the corner. Perfect.

The targeting could be so accurate that the ads could be honestly claimed as a feature, and a valuable one at that. But they can't be annoying. So you won't get phone calls from algorithmic robot telemarketers. All ads will likely be non-blocking, in computer science terms. You'll never be made to wait while an ad is playing. This leaves a lot of room for targeted ads to generate a huge rate of high-yield impressions.

The key here is that while bandwidth costs money, the content that passes over it could be worth a lot more. Google could conceivably create an unprecedentedly effective advertising platform, driving revenue that dwarfs bandwidth costs. As long as the ads are targeted and unobtrusive, Google could provide no-charge wireless service, a slick smartphone platform, and a remarkably insightful ad system.

But there's those privacy issues... Fri, 03 Aug 2007 03:05:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (butters) Comments Because what we need is http://osnews.com/thread?260516 http://osnews.com/thread?260516 for the Google behemoth to grow even bigger and eventually become a monopoly. Awesome.
On the other hand, forgetting what it's core business is usually spells doom of some kind for a company.Edited 2007-08-03 03:38 Fri, 03 Aug 2007 03:37:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Soulbender) Comments bidding war http://osnews.com/thread?260521 http://osnews.com/thread?260521 If true, I bet this plays a roll in their plans to bid for the radio frequences going up for auction, along with them wanting those 4 open rules that would bind the winnner too. Free or super cheap wifi phone plans and webtablet devices.... Fri, 03 Aug 2007 04:16:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (xeoron) Comments constant delta http://osnews.com/thread?260527 http://osnews.com/thread?260527 The only news here is that in the last 8 months the gphone has gone from being a year in the future to being . . .

wait for it. . .



a year in the future. Fri, 03 Aug 2007 04:53:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Cloudy) Comments No thanks http://osnews.com/thread?260570 http://osnews.com/thread?260570 Google are going to have to do a lot to satisfy many folks over privacy before this takes off as more than a toy. I'd rather not have Google listening in to calls and texts, and if Google say they won't, then who will monitor their behaviour? I wonder when people are going to stop being so naive and accepting of this outfit. This is not just a technology issue. No matter what Google may say, the basic deal here is that you are selling them your privacy. Fri, 03 Aug 2007 10:15:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (moleskine) Comments impressive http://osnews.com/thread?260581 http://osnews.com/thread?260581 well done to google for trying something new! Apple released a nice phone but nothing about it would change mobile phone use. This changes the way we will think about PAYING for a phone. If this model works the other networks will have no choice but to copycat Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:32:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Adurbe) Comments RE: JavaFX Mobile? http://osnews.com/thread?260619 http://osnews.com/thread?260619 i was thinking the same. Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:21:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (gelosilente) Comments privacy http://osnews.com/thread?260621 http://osnews.com/thread?260621 I can't think of any aspect of my private life that could be monetized. But I don't consider things like what kind of pizza I like or even something like what books I enjoy reading, my private life. It's just stuff. Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:24:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (alucinor) Comments RE: Because what we need is http://osnews.com/thread?260636 http://osnews.com/thread?260636 It's key business is pretty much unchanged. Search engines advertise sites based on users search parameters, and the google phone provides ads as well.

It's just stepping up to the next gen of ads in a networked society - this doesn't strike me as an illogical progression from the e-mail based services they offer. Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:42:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Laurence) Comments RE: No thanks http://osnews.com/thread?260640 http://osnews.com/thread?260640
This is not just a technology issue. No matter what Google may say, the basic deal here is that you are selling them your privacy.


That ship had sailed years ago. Store cards / club card schemes monitor customers shopping habits. Banks monitor customers spending habits. Employers monitor staffs social habits via social networks like facebook. CCTV cameras are everywhere (particularly here in Britain). Everyday we're being observed and monitored by dozens of organisations - Google are not the first and by no means the last. It's just their company size and the apparent transparency in which they use their data (e.g. personalised adverts) that scare people.

The only way to protect your privacy is to close your bank accounts, cancel your phone lines and live in a cave - and even then the US will probably be watching you from space incase you're training terrorists ;-) Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:52:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Laurence) Comments