posted by Amjith Ramanujam on Sat 19th Jul 2008 19:01 UTC, submitted by cypress
Linux and UNIX-like operating systems in general are regarded as being more secure for the common user, in contrast with operating systems that have "Windows" as part of their name. Why is that? When entering a dispute on the subject with a Windows user, the most common argument he tries to feed me is that Windows is more widespread, and therefore, more vulnerable. Apart from amusing myths like "Linux is only for servers" or "does it have a word processor?", the issue of Linux desktop security is still seriously misunderstood.
Related Articles
posted by Adam S on Tue 26th Aug 2008 21:12
posted by Amjith Ramanujam on Mon 25th Aug 2008 20:19, submitted by bartman
posted by Thom Holwerda on Sat 23rd Aug 2008 15:31