Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Jul 2005 19:16 UTC
IBM IBM has today presented various new versions of their G5 processor at the Power Everywhere Forum in Japan. Firstly, it introduced the much-anticipated PowerPC 970MP, the dual-core version of the G5. In addition, they also announced 3 low-power G5s, ranging from 1.2Ghz at 13W to 1.6Ghz at 16W. These processors will most likely find their way into Apple's Macs.
Thread beginning with comment 1007
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Wow
by ma_d on Thu 7th Jul 2005 20:14 UTC
ma_d
Member since:
2005-06-29

13W.....

Is that best or average?

Reply Score: 1

RE: Wow
by on Thu 7th Jul 2005 20:29 in reply to "Wow"
Member since:

According to the slides it's 13W (typical)..whatever that means ;) .

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE[2]: Wow
by kaiwai on Fri 8th Jul 2005 07:57 in reply to "RE: Wow"
kaiwai Member since:
2005-07-06

LOL, 'typical' sounds like the old joke, "how long is a piece of string?" ;)

I would say that Apple already knew about this product well in advance; the issue isn't so much the power consumption NOW but the power consumption later on - when the clock speed starts going up, and the wattage goes up as well, the two will get out of wack.

From what I understand, as Apple shows it on their PR, Apple need something that has equal performance to IBMs future road maps, but without the watt consumption hanging over it; Intel has shown its cards, and Apple likes it - Apple was probably also persuaded by the completely integrated solution - video, audio, wireless etc etc The video may have looked weak now, but I'd say that the future video chipsets by Intel will be a massive improvement - equal to that of the 'value end' Nvidia and ATI priced chipsets.

I think people forget, Intel offered the whole deal - they not only offered the foot long sub, the included a drink and 4 biscuits at no extra charge - thats in comparison to IBM who were just selling the Sub, and required the customer to find the other parts of different vendors.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE: Wow
by rayiner on Thu 7th Jul 2005 21:19 in reply to "Wow"
rayiner Member since:
2005-07-06

IBM, like Intel, reports average thermal design power. I couldn't tell you how much higher max thermal design power is, but for reference, a Prescott with 130W TDP can use over 180W under load. It should be noted that AMD deserves kudos for citing max thermal design power in their specs.

Reply Parent Score: 3