Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Jul 2005 14:41 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 1058
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Gnome bloat and is slow
by on Thu 7th Jul 2005 23:21
in reply to "RE: Gnome bloat and is slow"
"Memory, relative to the other parts of a computer is cheap. The difference between GNOME and KDE is at most 50-100MB. At today's prices, that's less than $10 worth of RAM. There is no way that is expensive for anyone with a computer."
All the same, I'd prefer if it didn't use more RAM than is necessary (this measured by comparing to comparable alternatives). The less it uses, the more is left for other programs.
RE[3]: Gnome bloat and is slow
by rayiner on Fri 8th Jul 2005 01:11
in reply to "RE[2]: Gnome bloat and is slow"




Member since:
2005-07-06
Gnome is bloat.The Fedora core4 when I entered the gnome default environment,it consumed memory more than the kde 3.4 in fc4.
Memory, relative to the other parts of a computer is cheap. The difference between GNOME and KDE is at most 50-100MB. At today's prices, that's less than $10 worth of RAM. There is no way that is expensive for anyone with a computer.
gnome's no future
I think GNOME and KDE both have very bright futures. I recently installed Fedora Core 4 on my new computer, and I have to say that GNOME 2.10 is a nice environment. I've only been using it a couple of days, but it is clean, uncluttered, and very stable (I haven't encountered a bug yet). It's also pretty fast, though anything less would be inexcusable on a dual-core athlon64. It's certainly one of the more enjoyable user experiences I've had with a computer in the last few years.