To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Most of them in a klutered and disorganized way.
Hmmmm. I know it might sound really kool for you to spell every 'C' word with a 'K' as a little joke, but unfortunately, absolutely anyone can shout and write the words 'clutter' and 'disorganised' as a response to everything. If KDE has implemented something, then it has implemented something.
For example, the stopped/broken downloads bit is handled pretty well by KGet. Regarding the linguistic search, I think the guy has got a bit confused there because what he really wants is a contextual search system. What he's describing isn't going to give him the results he wants. That isn't going to be accomplished by Beagle as it stands because it needs a much wider infrastructure in the desktop environment. That's one of the motivations behind Kat and the infant Tenor framework, but it's a huge amount of work obviously.
How about you have a look through the effort that this guy has put in, have a look at Gnome and have a look at KDE and see what has been implemented, what is being implemented and how and give a running commentary? Granted, he isn't talking about stuff that can just be solved in KDE or Gnome though.
What's interesting as well is how many of the 40 suggested improvements are already implemented and shipping in KDE.
Gnome has Gnome's problems and KDE has KDE's problems. I am sure many of the usability improvements slated for KDE 4 have been implemented in Gnome2 for many versions.




Member since:
2006-01-28
Some good suggestions. I particularly like the idea of having many applications share the same data backend so that there is no need to import or export data.
In fact, if nothing else, this would give the free desktop a very competitive edge over everything else out there by showing that we compete on features and cooperate in not keeping user data hostage.
What's interesting as well is how many of the 40 suggested improvements are already implemented and shipping in KDE.