Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 30th Mar 2006 19:36 UTC, submitted by Jane Walker
Thread beginning with comment 109828
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: improvement over XP
by Anonymous Penguin on Fri 31st Mar 2006 00:44
in reply to "RE[5]: improvement over XP"
RE[7]: improvement over XP
by sappyvcv on Fri 31st Mar 2006 00:47
in reply to "RE[6]: improvement over XP"
RE[7]: improvement over XP
by Nex6 on Fri 31st Mar 2006 01:08
in reply to "RE[6]: improvement over XP"
I agree thats poor logic. Even Gnome uses a 'regisrty' now. and Linux is full of libararys and dependacy issues.
and as far of filesystem, NTFS is a pretty good fileststem. it has ACLs, is journeled and pretty soon will have transactional support. sure it has to be defraged, but thats not a big deal and its not required.
i have NT 4 servers still running without issue and that get pretty heavy usage. these things are form like 1998.
and linux, is not even compatible with itself, not even same distro stuff.....
-Nex6







Member since:
2005-07-06
Wait, so because you list a few things that remain in Windows (partly compatibility reasons), that means there aren't "many major changes under the hood"?
That's poor logic, man.