Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 17th Apr 2006 18:38 UTC, submitted by vondur
Mac OS X Robert X. Cringely thinks that Apple will offer virtualization in Mac OS 10.5, but in order to do that, he thinks Apple will need to drop Mach. "So Apple will at least offer the option for users to run a virtualized version of Windows Vista atop OS X. Don't be surprised, either, to see that OS X 10.5 has a new kernel, finally giving up Mach and a big piece of its NeXTstep heritage. I write this for one thing - because OS X has kernel problems and needs some help, especially with swap space. I say it also because of the departure of Avie Tevanian, Apple's chief software technology officer, and the guy who hung onto Mach for so long." The Mach kernel has recently been the target for complaints; esp. in server duties, OSX' kernel lags behind significantly compared to i.e. Linux.
Thread beginning with comment 115770
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Linux is an absolute no go
by archiesteel on Tue 18th Apr 2006 00:21 UTC
archiesteel
Member since:
2005-07-02

I'm talking about how different people intepret the GPL in different ways. THAT means it's a legal no man's land, because judge A might intepret the GPL in a different way than judge B.

As someone else has already noted, all laws are like that, that's why jurisprudence is important.

I'm curious, however. What could be different (and one imagines, incompatible) interpretations of the GPL? Because to me the GPL's language is quite straightforward, which is one of the reasons very few people have tried to challenge it (and no one has successfully done so).

As to whether it's suitable for Apple or not depends on how Apple's proprietary parts of the OS integrate with the Kernel. It's quite possible to imagine a proprietary shell that would run on a Linux kernel, I don't see why Apple couldn't the same, a priori...

Reply Score: 3