Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Thu 20th Apr 2006 00:00 UTC
Windows "I still remember the day very clearly. It was Monday, October 27, 2003. Several thousand developers - and, let's face it, quite a few garden variety Windows enthusiasts - charged into Hall A at the Los Angeles Convention Center like teenage girls at a Justin Timberlake concert, volleying for the best seats. I've been to more Bill Gates keynotes than I can count, and this was the first time I ever saw anyone climb over other people in order to secure a better view (no offense to Mr. Gates, but he's not exactly a dynamic speaker). It was PDC 2003 and everything was right with my world." Read more of the editorial here.
Thread beginning with comment 116472
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Paul....
by kaiwai on Thu 20th Apr 2006 02:36 UTC
kaiwai
Member since:
2005-07-06

Paul hasn't changed his tune, he does this all the time, its like a wave; it does hype, hype, hype, doomsday, doomsday, mini-hype, doomsday, then when the new product is released, he'll come out of the closet with his cheerleaders uniformed.

He'll dance around claiming, "OMG! its unbelievable! how could I ever question Microsoft! they've done something amazing!" then spit out 4 weeks of 'indepth analysis' along with the necessary sound bites from 'those in the know' at Microsoft (more free PR for Microsoft) as if it were the second coming.

Sorry, this is the same Paul over again, hype, deflate then rehype again. Its the equivilance of asking what Bill Gates thinks about their 'future line up'.

Reply Score: 5

RE: Paul....
by mono on Thu 20th Apr 2006 08:41 in reply to "Paul...."
mono Member since:
2005-10-19

"Paul hasn't changed his tune, he does this all the time [...] when the new product is released, he'll come out of the closet with his cheerleaders uniformed"

I agree. But i think it's somehow consistent. There is nothing new in this article. He just collected all the bad things to warn Microsoft again.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Paul....
by kaiwai on Thu 20th Apr 2006 09:54 in reply to "RE: Paul...."
kaiwai Member since:
2005-07-06

I agree. But i think it's somehow consistent. There is nothing new in this article. He just collected all the bad things to warn Microsoft again.

Some how consistant with his typical cycle; remember he went on a Windows XP slamming feast, then when service pack 2 came out, he was gushing over it like some sort of hot super model.

A few months later, he was back to 'slamming it' with an article on how his wif just *loves* her Mac, this is just more in the cycle.

Like I said, mark my words, when Vista is relased, we'll have a review of it by Paul, and he'll be purring like a kitten.

As for this article, its just 'ooh, look at me, I too can be skeptical, along with other clueless journalists! I'll throw my 5 cents worth into the discussion and hope my website hit goes through the roof!'

The sad fact is, he also tries to play the so-called 'windows fanboy in impartial technology analyst clothing' - he wants people to think that he is impartial so that some how his arguments will carry more weight; sorry, his bad facade and opinions hold even less weight than Dvorak.

I can say, atleast where I stand, when I offer my 5cents worth, I'm open to saying that all software and hardware sucks, some just sucks less than others, and hec, I'm quite willing to bash the software I like, and praise the software I dislike when deserved, the problem is, Paul has turned it into a cycle of hate, love, hate, love based on some sort of 'mission' rather than trying to form impartial opinions on Microsofts products.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE: Paul....
by Ookaze on Thu 20th Apr 2006 15:05 in reply to "Paul...."
Ookaze Member since:
2005-11-14

Sorry, this is the same Paul over again, hype, deflate then rehype again

More than that, he is still a big zealot.
Evidence is that he can't help using "Linux and Apple fanatics", but never for MS side.
He prefers using "Windows fans" for MS side.

Reply Parent Score: 1