Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 5th May 2006 19:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 121505
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Fair comment. It's from a <personal_opinion> *cosmetic* point of view I prefer QT </personal_opinion>. That's interesting about the licensing though. So no chance for a version of Firefox built with QT?
If you're interested about the Firefox thing it's Firefox's (save/load) dialogues that bug me; they're always to small, hard to use etc. But thats running it under FreeBSD, I'm sure you Linux folk have that sorted 
RE[3]: Firefox's Choice
by anonymousbrowser on Sat 6th May 2006 17:52
in reply to "RE[2]: Firefox's Choice"




Member since:
2006-04-28
So what do you prefer about it? I think the firefox GTK connection is probably because of long standing licensing issues. Qt is commercial product developed and owned by a single entity, not an idea i like, even if there are safeguards in place. Pure Qt applications are generally unpleasant in X, just look at skype, KDE applications often behave strangely under other desktop environments, maybe that's another reason why GTK was chosen?