Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 6th May 2006 17:01 UTC, submitted by Phoronix
3D News, GL, DirectX "We have been overwhelmed with requests to take a serious look at the frame-rate performance differences between the various open-source and proprietary contenders. Our first article on this topic, which will likely be the first of a series of examinations, is looking at the differences between the X.Org open-source ATI Radeon driver and that of ATI's official but proprietary fglrx display driver."
Thread beginning with comment 121644
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Interesting Article, but...
by mattst88 on Sat 6th May 2006 17:42 UTC
Member since:

Much too short. While comparisons involving the drivers FPS performance are nice, I'd have liked to have had the writer of the article go into some of the benefits of each driver. I mean, hello, would this even be an issue if the fglrx drivers weren't loaded with problems? (I want my VTs back). I would also have liked them to throw in a comparison of the Windows drivers if they're doing the article strictly on framerate.

Reply Score: 1