Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 5th May 2006 19:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 121760
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
actually, applications implemented that framework by themselves - it has been integrated back by gtk.
True, I think they use that as a benchmark as to whether they include a particular feature in the GTK kit itself - if there are enough applications using the functionality, to reduce duplication, throw it into the gtk library - you could say it is a rather democratic/freemarket way of doing things, let the majority speak as to the usefulness of something.
Although I'm a big KDE fan (using since 1.0), GTK is a great tool kit, what I think lets it down is the incompleteness of GNOME in terms of its infrastructure - which always seems to appear to look like half-completed projects, cobbled together with hype surround features that *might* appear in the future; HAL and DBUS being examples of this phenominon.
Edited 2006-05-07 00:52