Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 7th May 2006 19:17 UTC
Law and Order Sometimes, the smallest of things can amaze me. I'm a sucker for details, which probably lies at the base of my slightly obsessive-compulsive traits of keeping things organized, tidy, aligned, and neat. It's great to see some companies are suckers for details too. Unless the details just become too insignificant. Note: Sunday Eve Column. Short, this week, though.
Thread beginning with comment 122057
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Windows lacks lots of features
by twenex on Sun 7th May 2006 21:55 UTC in reply to "Windows lacks lots of features"
twenex
Member since:
2006-04-21

Linux doesn't include software, all of which comes from Torvalds, OY of Finland. It doesn't even include all GNU software, or only software provided by GNU.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

devurandom Member since:
2005-07-06

www.kernel.org doesn't include anything but the kernel, of course. But Linux distributions do, actually.
Would you be pleased to see Ubuntu or SuSE in a court because they're playing unfair for competition by bundling free mplayer or k3b instead of RealPlayer and NeroLinux?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

twenex Member since:
2006-04-21

I'm not playing wordgames here. A Linux distribution (which some refer to as a GNU/Linux distribution, to which some people object on such-and-such a ground...) is not a collection of software, all of which comes from one company.

On the contrary: quite often, Linux distributions include 3 or 4 or 5 different programs, from different companies/organizations, doing more or less the same thing (which leads to another set of complaints, but anyway)... Some distros include a default set of software, some provide almost nothing by default. Nevertheless, there is still a CHOICE between them - more of a choice than that provided by XP or XPN at the same price. And as I understand it, the inclusion or otherwise of RealPlayer and a version of Nero for Linux has more to do with their parent companies wanting to restrict the use of such programs, or with a lack of will or resources to port them.

I know of no Linux distro which even takes steps to *prevent* you installing any software, including that which they say they cannot bundle because to do so would be *illegal*.

Edited 2006-05-07 22:13

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

seguso Member since:
2005-06-29

open source software cannot play unfair for competition, so there would be no need to bring Suse in court even if it had the same market share as microsoft.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3