To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
In the realm of Linux users (or any group, for that matter), there are people who:
1. like to point fingers at their competitors, at every opportunity
2. like to defend their product, at every opportunity
It is to be expected that the people from group #1 will make the negative comments towards Windows and the people from group #2 will make defensive remarks towards Linux. It is only hypocritical if the comments you are referring to are coming from the same group.
I'm in group #2. So, I'm going to assume that the apologetic comments you are reading are not from the same people who have made negative comments
.
"In the realm of Linux users (or any group, for that matter), there are people who:
1. like to point fingers at their competitors, at every opportunity
2. like to defend their product, at every opportunity
...I'm in group #2."
And the people attacking Debian are probably Windows users who are in group #1. I personally think being in either group #1 or #2 is bad as being in the other group. Instead, people should be neutral and lay blame when it belongs and defend against attacks when they aren't deserved. IMHO, being hacked twice within a few years is very bad and is very close to being inexcusable.




.
Member since:
2006-02-17
How many apologists there are for this.
"Nothing wrong getting hacked... what is important restoring of data back and fixing the system not get hacked again."
"I wouldn't get too upset about this."
"You have to look at frequency. This kind of stuff happens regularly in the windows world. "
Wow
You'd never read that in response to a MS or OS X hack.