Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th Jul 2006 21:08 UTC
In a Q&A, Neelie Kroes, who fined MS for not complying with the EC's antitrust ruling, said: "I regret that the Commission has had to take such a step today, but given Microsoft's continued non-compliance to date, I have been left with no alternative. Today's decision reflects my determination to ensure that Microsoft complies with its obligations.Microsoft has claimed that its obligations in the decision are not clear, or that the obligations have changed. I cannot accept this characterisation - Microsoft's obligations are clearly outlined in the 2004 decision and have remained constant since then."
Thread beginning with comment 143470
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-10-11
you get the idea of a monopoly which apple isn't. I'm sure itunes is already under the radar. And you get the idea that MS was *not* asked to open source anything, just for documentation. I wodner why you people don't get it? It's good for us consumers so why protect MS which takes away our rights every day?...