Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 28th Jul 2006 20:24 UTC, submitted by snds24
Thread beginning with comment 147365
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2006-04-02
If I have a problem with something, I actually DO spend the time to give atleast a decent quality response and justification for that stance so that it comes accross as a decent bit of feed back rather than some clueless whining by a ranting teenager with a chip on both shoulders. [i]
That is your style, others might not choose to do something in a similar style all the time. They might just give a quick opinion during a short break on the job.
[[i]Not everybody got that much of time to kill on any topic.
Then maybe the said individual shouldn't reply unless they've actually got something valuable to add to the discussion; hence the reason I like Digg so much, the crap comments are weeded out early, and the coherent, quality ones remain. ]
That only indicates you can't tolerate others having a different style in expressing their opinions or writing posts.
[I don't see why a quick statement = immaturity.
What is mature about the statement, 'Windows is bloated, and it sucks!" - I don't know about you, but thats classic flamebait; ]
Well, if you are mature enough, you don't have to reply to this type of posts, right? Further, nobody sticks a gun to your forehead to force you to read them, correct?
The original post is like this "If Windows Live Messenger is any indication, Windows Vista will be a slow pig and a resource hog"
That is called inductive thinking, or extrapolation. The assumption is more like a prediction, not a dead accurate fact.