Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 20th Aug 2006 20:03 UTC
Linux If open source were a religion, Linus Torvalds, the Finnish engineer who wrote the core of the operating system that would become Linux, would be its prophet. In 1991, Mr Torvalds created the kernel, or core software, that would eventually be adopted by millions of computer users and lay the foundation for a vibrant open-source community. In an email interview with Red Herring, Mr Torvalds says the increasing focus of venture capitalists and large companies on open source can only be good for a community that, until now, was on the fringes of the commercial realm.
Thread beginning with comment 154285
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: If?
by Botty on Sun 20th Aug 2006 20:54 UTC in reply to "If?"
Botty
Member since:
2005-09-11

Actually, with so many followers it's more like a religion. A cult is just a small, recently formed religion. Opensource began well before Torvalds, infact proprietary software is the newcomer. I'd say Torvalds is an important disciple. Then again, since there is no specific person to assign to prophethood, might as well give him that.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[2]: If?
by sbergman27 on Sun 20th Aug 2006 21:17 in reply to "RE: If?"
sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

"""Actually, with so many followers it's more like a religion."""

I agree that it is truly a religion to some. However, as a descriptive term, I would be inclined to give it "cult" status.

If you count all the people involved in open source, there are a lot. However, most of those people have not adopted it as their religion. If you restrict membership to those free software fundamentalists who *have* adopted it as their religion, the numbers are, surely, much smaller. In the cult range, I'd say.

As would be expected, that subset is more vocal than the average, but still a fairly small number.

Edited 2006-08-20 21:18

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[3]: If?
by Botty on Sun 20th Aug 2006 21:55 in reply to "RE[2]: If?"
Botty Member since:
2005-09-11

Well, for one thing it is just a metaphor. I don't think anyone is really saying its a religion. yet. It could become a societal moral framework, I suppose.

The actual contributors are like the priests (maybe linus is like the pope). The users are like the churchgoers. By this you have a huge quantity of people, definitely a religion rather than a cult.

When you count a religion's patronage you don't just count its funamentalists.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[2]: If?
by diskinetic on Sun 20th Aug 2006 21:50 in reply to "RE: If?"
diskinetic Member since:
2005-12-09

Well, almost. In actuality, a religion has the added burden of answering and/or assuaging the fundamental quandries of life: its purpose and destiny among others. While open source is a hard-fought development tactic and a respected mode of operation, it's no more a religion than the "lather, rinse, repeat" advise on shampoo bottles. You can say its devotees are "cultish" in their faithfulness, but they fall short of believing (I very well hope) that open source is (or will divulge) the meaning of life.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1