Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 10th Sep 2006 20:38 UTC, submitted by fudel
Thread beginning with comment 161317
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-19
For and at are very different things.
All this suggestions, rumours and deductive conclusions still do not provide any real, legal information.
Maybe Bernd has just some contract with Magnussoft in personal form and pays developers from his own pocket, while other person from list (sales, support) are Magnussoft workers?
Who has rights to use source code? Kortz family? Some "virtual" company/entity which bought OEM rights from German company distributed R5 in past?
I have nothing against any method to development and keeping alive BeOS successor, but still should notice that most (if not 100%) of legal question raised in YT times are yet answered