Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 16th Sep 2006 17:39 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 163434
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: one more fork won't kill anyone
by Janizary on Tue 19th Sep 2006 15:07
in reply to "RE[4]: one more fork won't kill anyone"
But of those, how many are worth using? They have their tier system in place for a reason - only I386, AMD64, and sparc64 are real platforms for FreeBSD, not to mention xbox being just another random i386 box.
Alpha development has completely stopped, there will be nothing in or beyond 7.0. mips, pretty much a dead platform, likely heading the same way considering FreeBSD's reaction to Alpha's ceasing support.
On the whole, FreeBSD supports three platforms with any real focus - I am suprised really that PC-98 is in that group considering FreeBSD's position on outmoded platforms.




Member since:
2006-08-31
"FreeBSD is neither a fork of NetBSD nor is it able to run on many platforms, so what have you been smoking?"

Sorry, I should have been more specific!
I replied specifically to the statement:
"Can you imagine a BSD system that runs on just about every architecture with good driver support?"
And the combination of NetBSD, OpenBSD and FreeBSD fill that very nicely
FreeBSD does run on several platforms:
http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/
* FreeBSD/alpha Project
* FreeBSD/amd64 Project
* FreeBSD/ARM Project
* FreeBSD/i386 Project
* FreeBSD/ia64 Project
* FreeBSD/MIPS Project
* FreeBSD/pc98 Project
* FreeBSD/ppc Project
* FreeBSD/sparc64 Project
* FreeBSD/xbox Project
BTW, I've been smoking BSDs since ~94