Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Oct 2006 18:52 UTC, submitted by chimby
Thread beginning with comment 167600
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
ClamWin is actually really good. It's usually the first one to recognize new viruses, worms and trojans.
It doesn't know so many of the viruses from the 80'es and the early 90'es, but they are however irrelevant.
ClamWin (based on ClamAV) is usually a better choice than Kapersky.
ClamWin do not have on-access scanning, but that is irrelevant. On-access scanning tend to not work anyway.





Member since:
2006-01-09
Well then, it will be open-source to the rescue right? Oh that's right there already is an open-source anti-virus called ClamAV.
Are you suggesting ClamAV doesn't work or isn't effective?