Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 9th Oct 2006 17:30 UTC, submitted by JCooper
Thread beginning with comment 170221
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-24
<"Because PJ is not much of a journalist and has a strong bias against Microsoft. These are the reaons I do not visit Groklaw.">
PJ is more of an analyst than a journalist, and bias or no, her insights have proved correct far more often than not. In addition, the membership boasts some other fine minds -- the power of Groklaw is not simply Pamela herself, but the entire synthesis provided by the "many eyes" concept applied to the legal side.
True, there's a lot of noise sometimes obscuring the signal, but when you make the effort to read the signal, you learn a lot.
I think Groklaw has been valuable as well in digging up information that lawyers could use. Why else would Darl McBride and his hired goons be so obsessed with PJ?
Without Groklaw, SCO's FUD attack would have been far more successful than it was, even though ultimately they would probably still have lost the case.(cases)