Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th Oct 2006 20:13 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 171031
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I know what you mean
by halfmanhalfamazing on Thu 12th Oct 2006 03:55
in reply to "RE: Wow, that's pointless....."
------------However, I'm still happy with my fanless Mendocino CPU (Celeron 500 MHz) which is crunching PCLinuxOS code now just as good as seven years ago when it was introduced to consumer PC market.-------------
My pop keeps telling me "you need multicore" "you need multicore, that 2ghz you have is garbage" which I can't say I agree. That would still leave me with the same fundamental problem. The biggest bottleneck out there is the hard drive. Not the processor.
Man, I can't wait for Samsung's flash SSD's to drop in price. All I need is 16GB for the boot drive, that's plenty big enough for SuSE.
I'm going to have this computer for a long time.............





Member since:
2006-01-02
Has anybody read an article "Miltiplied"Linux Desktop Migration Startegy ( see OSNews link http://www.omni-ts.com/linux-desktop/linux-desktop-migration.html )?
Many modern CPU are already very very idle and that's where Novell sees an opportunity for for their "multiplied Linux Desktop" . In other words they are after better utilization of current hardware which is good.
When INTEL announced an end of "fighting over the CPU speed" era year ago some analist raised the questions what's gonna be next battlefield for CPU manufacturers. And now, as we can see, its packaging more CPU cores on die. And I don't see where it's gonna end up.
However, I'm still happy with my fanless Mendocino CPU (Celeron 500 MHz) which is crunching PCLinuxOS code now just as good as seven years ago when it was introduced to consumer PC market.