Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Oct 2006 19:29 UTC
Mac OS X Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak says that Apple did not need NeXT, the company that provided the foundation for Mac OS X; he argues that System 7 wasn't nearly as bad as it was made out to be. Wozniak also says that Mac OS 9 was more secure than OS X is now: Mac OS X is built in Unix and is therefore more prone to attacks because people are familiar with the holes in Unix, explained Woznaik. "Some of the holes in Unix are well known. So keeping Firewalls on is more important. And we keep announcing, even our own security fixes, not as many as Microsoft but still we never really had those in the OS 9 days."
Thread beginning with comment 175401
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
security by obscuirty?
by nadiasvertex on Wed 25th Oct 2006 22:14 UTC
Member since:

Since when has THAT been a good idea?

Reply Score: 1

RE: security by obscuirty?
by Soulbender on Thu 26th Oct 2006 06:01 in reply to "security by obscuirty?"
Soulbender Member since:

"Since when has THAT been a good idea?"

Are you saying that strong passwords isn't a good idea? There's good obscurity and bad obscurity.

Reply Parent Score: 1