Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 29th Oct 2006 23:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 176718
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"I've found that at high resolutions, a minimize button on the left side of the toolbar and a close button on the right side works better, as you won't find yourself accidentally clicking the wrong button."
Try NeXTstep / GNUStep / WindowMaker. :-)
"Maximize at most higher resolutions is pretty useless (unless it's an MDI program), and window borders are pretty much obsolete thanks to drop shadows."
I agree here. But there's really nothing new - all features are available and have been (for years( in non-"Windows" GUIs. :-)





Member since:
2005-06-30
Some of these are very nice looking, especially in the usability category, and are a huge improvement over the default Windows XP interface. I would like to have seen, however, an interface that accompanies rearranging the standard min,max,close button layout on the right. I've found that at high resolutions, a minimize button on the left side of the toolbar and a close button on the right side works better, as you won't find yourself accidentally clicking the wrong button. Maximize at most higher resolutions is pretty useless (unless it's an MDI program), and window borders are pretty much obsolete thanks to drop shadows. Of course this is entirely my opinion, but if WindowBlinds supports rearranging button layout, these themes should at least be designed with that mind. Some themes, like Acrylic, reflect this well; others, like GPod or Jitter, only work with the traditional button layout. This should at least be taken into consideration when the final "Most usable" theme is selected.
As for the "Most original" category, usability issues aside, I think that LORE takes the cake with the "OMGWTF where the hell are my buttons?" idea it has going on.