To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
>It's not much different than copying a search and adding an extra criterium.
I love it when people "meh" a feature because it isn't much different than whatever their hack is. I can hardly think of any improvement in any OS that isn't a codified version of a workaround people were already using.
>>>>>
From wikipedia:
verb-object paradigm
1. Initially, no text is selected.
2. The user initiates the operation by selecting a move command in some manner.
3. The system displays a prompt such as "Move what?"
4. The system enters a modal state in which the only actions available to the user are either to select text or cancel the move operation.
5. The user selects the text in some manner.
6. The system displays a prompt "To where?"
7. The system enters a modal state in which the only actions available to the user are either to indicate an insertion point or cancel the move operation.
8. The user indicates the insertion point and confirms the move operation.
9. The effects of the move are displayed.
>>>>>
This is not to say that the feature described in the blog is as revolutionary as cut/paste but I'm sure that when Apple introduced cut-and-paste to replace this some people said, "Hey I can already do that!" You sure can, be my guest. I'll take cut-and-paste.
Over the long term search composition it is much better than duping and revising saved searches as you describe. You can build a pretty sophisticated quickly with just a few saved searches rather than having a truckload of searches that might just one or two parameters difference between them.
Though BeOS search was amazing and in some ways still more advanced than the comparative hacks out today, including Vista's search, I don't recall being build a search in the manner described in the article. It has been a long time though.
I do recall being able to right click on a saved search and having the dynamic, and utterly instant! results pop up in a context menu without having to open find. Now that was cool.





Member since:
2006-09-30
It's not much different than copying a search and adding an extra criterium.
Is it me or this search window looks surprisingly similar to BeOS ?
http://lestat.orenet.co.uk/~kendra/graphics/beos_query_builder_1.jp...
Be, Inc. should really have patented stuff years ago, they would be rich by now (even though I despise software patents, but since everyone uses them...)