To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Microsoft has spent 20+ years employing various anti-competitive tactics.
Of course you would say that. You think all closed source software is unethical. But in fact, Microsoft has spent 20 years competing. And manyof their competitors shot themselves in the foot.
The classic anti-Microsoft lie is that poor old Netscape was wiped out because Microsft gave away IE ... when the truth is, Netscape stole Mosaic from the University of Illinois and gave it away for free to destroy all the companies that legally licensed the code from Spyglass (the designated company). And Microsoft won the browser war because IE 4 was better than Netscape 4 and Netscape 5 imploded and IE 5 was fantastic.
//You think all closed source software is unethical.//
Not at all. There is a vast selection of ethical, quality closed-source software available on the market.
There is just one attribute common to all closed-source software ... and that is that as an end user you have no reliable way to evaluate what is in any given piece of closed-source software, no way to ascertain if it is in fact ethical and quality and value-for-money.
One is forced to look at peripheral attributes of the software to try to evaluate closed-source software. One has try to ascertain if:
(1) the software has good functionality,
(2) the software is good value for its price,
(3) the software competes on its merits with other products and performs well in comparison, and
(4) the software supports documented, open standards so that in using it I can viably move to a competing product if circumstances warrant it, and I can interchange my data with other colleagues who may use a competing product.
Most Microsoft software is characterised by being closed source, by "scoring" relatively well in considerations (1) and (2) above, but failing utterly in considerations (3) and (4) above.
Plenty companies make closed-source software, and yes, I do think that is unethical. But I don't badmouth them the way I badmouth Microsoft. Why? Because not all of them make abominable software at high prices, lie to their customers, and crush all opposition. Then again, it's blindly obvious nothing at all is ever going to change your mind, so keep on lying to yourself.
It's really quite pathetic.





Member since:
2006-04-21
Microsoft has spent 20+ years employing various anti-competitive tactics. This supposed "new face" of Microsoft is months old at best, so the jury's still out. And the FUDMeister still spinneth.