Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th Nov 2006 23:05 UTC, submitted by SEJeff
Thread beginning with comment 185173
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: I Invite OpenSuse developers switch to fedora
by Rocinante on Sat 25th Nov 2006 00:01
in reply to "RE[3]: I Invite OpenSuse developers switch to fedora"
RE[4]: I Invite OpenSuse developers switch to fedora
by wirespot on Sat 25th Nov 2006 15:18
in reply to "RE[3]: I Invite OpenSuse developers switch to fedora"
..AND the fact that the Linux API may change at some point, making a binary driver unusable until the company cares to change it, compile it and distribute it again. Remember the infamous case of the SM56 Motorola softmodem, who got its own binary driver for exactly one kernel version, Mandrake something or other and then never again.
RE[5]: I Invite OpenSuse developers switch to fedora
by miscz on Sat 25th Nov 2006 15:46
in reply to "RE[4]: I Invite OpenSuse developers switch to fedora"





Member since:
2005-07-17
I think the loophole is that binary driver developers use a layer which is compatible with GPL but also allows linking to binary blobs. It's a gray area but seems OK with most kernel developers.

Distros don't ship binary drivers for two reasons:
-free software philosophy
-need for agreement with company that created the driver
I might be wrong too though