Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 16th Jan 2007 13:34 UTC, submitted by Tomasz Dominikowski
Thread beginning with comment 202164
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I keep on seeing this argument, but the same thing applies to Windows, all the FOSS software that has been ported to SkyOS has already landed in Windows Land. The only difference is that (to date, almost) all the FOSS ports to SkyOs have been made (publically available) by the lead developer.
The actual Operating System (Kernel, Core driver modules, API, even Windowing API), is (apparently) all new, and this is the thing that you are paying for. Of course, the extra FOSS bits are sweetners to make the transition easier, but Robert is not unreasonable for charging for the bits that he has independently (of any OSS project) done himself.






Member since:
2006-09-22
As far as SkyOS goes, I really need to check this out. Maybe it's time to actually purchase (!!!) a license.
Count me in, this is gettin quite impressive. It feels kind of painful though, because there are many, many, parts of SkyOS based on FOSS. _I'm not_ saying that Robert's (and all the SkyOS Team's) work isn't worth the mere US$30 but, talking seriously, I don't need SkyOS to run Classpath nor Wine.
Anyway, an amazing work wich deserves to, at least, a try :-)