To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Pfff... Like it can, with all that money wasted on EU-based competitors to US-based companies like CNN and Google.
Exactly why is it that the EU is trying to level the software playing field, anyway? For its own companies to compete against Microsoft?
Wait a minute, does it even have any EU-based companies involved in this case?
If not, then why is it that these US companies are appealing to the EU to restrict another US-based company's practices?
I don't think this involves any "acting in the interests of its population" at any point to me.
And I would like to see MS finally no longer getting away with not giving other companies access to the languages their software speakes:
- SMB network protocol (not given SAMBA the docs for 4 years)
- OOXML is NOT fully documented, nobody but MS will be able to READ all OOXML documents (although everybody will be able to write OOXML documents)
A level playing field makes companies compete against each other with all of the companies adhering to international standards. And that gives us users interoperability and low prices, which is the goal of a market economy.
Microsoft is like a bubble of centralized communism within a capitalistic universe.




Member since:
2006-01-10
...so they run to a jurisdiction predisposed to rule against Microsoft on any and all issues regardless of the merits of the case.
Care to give examples where the EU has ruled against Microsoft without regard to the "merits" of the case against them ? Looking at the EU and the US it seems to me that Microsoft has the US in its pocket whereas the EU is simply acting in the interests of its population by trying to provide a level playing field.