Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 2nd Feb 2007 11:33 UTC, submitted by frik85
Thread beginning with comment 208348
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
So why doesn't the consumer do their own advocacy by voting with their damn wallets, instead of expecting others to do the work for them? If you want to boycott something, then boycott the entertainment industry.
Or you can boycott all DRM which means if, like me, you consider WPA and WGA as a form of DRM you can boycott Vista too.





Member since:
2005-11-13
Remember that by running Vista, you are actively supporting the companies who utilise these anti-consumer measures, and by running Vista you are agreeing to let them continue doing so.
Alright, so you tell me which one is worse:
- Person A buys Vista, but doesn't purchase any DRM'd content by the RIAA/MPAA
- Person B boycotts Vista in order to stick it to 'the man', but then goes out and buys a Playstation 3 (includes a Blu-Ray player) and/or and Xb0x 360 with the HD-DVD addon, and a buttload of movies to go along with it
A quote from the article:
This hardware requirement has infuriated consumers across the globe, as Microsoft has stated the movie and music industry have demanded this level of protection. However, it appears that no one has offered any advocacy on behalf of the consumer
So why doesn't the consumer do their own advocacy by voting with their damn wallets, instead of expecting others to do the work for them? If you want to boycott something, then boycott the entertainment industry.
Edited 2007-02-02 15:01