Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 3rd Feb 2007 16:43 UTC, submitted by mwtomlinson
Thread beginning with comment 208961
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2006-08-04
0) There is not one program that does anything useful that does not infringe upon a patent. There are violations on all sides.
1) The novell deal is basically saying, let's not fight over this. Saying that novell "admits there are violations" is meaningless. So what, microsoft is in violation too. remember _this is why software patents are bad_ at least as things stand now.
2) The GPL3 solution is basically, if you give code, you can't sue. You're with us or against us.
So which is better?
A "truce" or drawing a line in the sand?