Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 17th Feb 2007 18:45 UTC, submitted by GhePeU
Thread beginning with comment 214009
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I started my AIGLX experience with Beryl and I was amazed by what it can do on my 855GM integrated Intel graphic card.
But a few months ago I tried Compiz and I think I prefer it over Beryl. Reasons?
- it "seems" smoother and faster,
- sane default settings,
- sane default plugins, and
- less crashes.
Anway that's just my personal opinion and preferences. But I think the stability over blingbling trade-off that David chooses is starting to show off, especially in the lower end Intel integrated graphic cards.
Machine - Ubuntu 6.10 on Inspiron 510m
Reference - http://gandalfn.wordpress.com/howto/howto-compiz-aiglx-on-edgy




Member since:
2005-08-01
I remember when quinnstorm started releasing compiz-quinnstorm-9999.ebuild's during the early days of compiz in Gentoo.
Why did I choose that day to use quinnstorm? Because it had intel specific patches (that I needed) and those patches would only make it into compiz after a long time later. I was tired of metacity, and it was stopping me from using linux. gwd to the rescue.
And from that point on I followed quinnstorm -> beryl, because it provided the latest patches for problems, even if occasionally there was a show stopping bug.
Beryl is perfectly! stable for me on my 855gm intel chipset. There are some buggy plugins, but the core itself is solid.
I don't think I could go back to compiz until it catches up in terms of features and usability. Beryl makes programming (and managing many files/windows) a snap on my small 1280x800 12" laptop screen.