Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 17th Feb 2007 18:45 UTC, submitted by GhePeU
X11, Window Managers David Reveman writes: "I'd like to get all of you updated on the compiz related things discussed at the X developer conference that was held last week. My talk was mainly focused on 'what's next' and how to get desktop compositing in X to the next level." He also discussed the fork: "I had the chance to talk to Quinn Storm from the beryl project during xdevconf. I would have hoped that the current situation with beryl could be improved but it seems like Quinn at least isn't interested in that. However, after talking to Quinn it's very clear to me that the fork was partially motivated by assumptions that were wrong."
Thread beginning with comment 214229
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[9]: sour grapes?
by on Sun 18th Feb 2007 22:04 UTC
Member since:

first , i am not arguing who the best side is ! i am not arguing who did what , and who is doing more important work , and who is more capable. history is there , and so is svn and cvs and git logs.

But you arguing that compiz is better than beryl right ?

Well if you really want to end this why you starting that ?

to finish , to say that you should not learn from beryl in this case ... or any case , its just plain arrogant , foolish and wrong.

Well i thnik beryl dont have anything to offer in usability area for compiz, and i dont think this is arrogant, only point of view about beryl usability versus compiz usability.

Reply Score: 1