Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 17th Mar 2007 00:26 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 222138
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: laptop responsiveness
by broch on Sat 17th Mar 2007 04:41
in reply to "RE: laptop responsiveness"
I have Arch on HP Pavilion dv5000. It took me 1 day to make everything work. More or less as much time as average user needs to customize OS to her/his liking.
I am not advertising Arch or Slack (this is only response to sidenote about difficulties wih KISS distros), whole point is that Fiesty is not "plug-and-play". In contrast to let's say Slack, Ubuntu wants to compete on with windows for the same mainstream group of users. Concluding from your review, Faisty simply failed.
I installed first BSD in 94-95' and first linux (RH) in 96'. I don't think that this matters. Ubuntu is targetting users with no experience.
RE[3]: laptop responsiveness
by Eugenia on Sat 17th Mar 2007 04:45
in reply to "RE[2]: laptop responsiveness"





Member since:
2005-06-28
Sorry, but I don't agree with you. I am one of the oldies in the Arch/Slackware userbase, and to get working all the stuff that ubuntu has given me out of the box, have taken me up to a week of headaches in some instances with arch/slack! With ubuntu it was a matter of 2 hours to find solutions for the much fewer inconveniences that has given me and are described in the review.
So overall, as a desktop, I prefer Ubuntu.