Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 25th Mar 2007 17:44 UTC, submitted by suka
Thread beginning with comment 224756
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Mono/Microsoft collaboration
by Moochman on Tue 27th Mar 2007 18:57
in reply to "RE[3]: Mono/Microsoft collaboration"
RE[5]: Mono/Microsoft collaboration
by nberardi on Tue 27th Mar 2007 19:40
in reply to "RE[4]: Mono/Microsoft collaboration"
I think you are still stuck in the 90's with your mentality about Microsoft.
I think you are still stuck in the reality-distortion field with the idea that Microsoft has changed. They haven't.
I think you are still stuck in the reality-distortion field with the idea that Microsoft has changed. They haven't.
And neither have you obviously, so why expect anything from Microsoft?
Obviously I don't believe what I just said, but it is rather self centered to believe you have all the answers.




Member since:
2005-07-10
I don't think you really understand the benefits of .NET working on other platforms. Or at least you don't see it from Microsoft's perspective. Who do you think is going to benefit from a wealth of software being developed on .NET? Especially all the new compilers that compile against the CLR. There is Python, PHP, COBOL, FORTRAN, some supported by organizations some supported by guys that just program on the weekends. So what good does it do for Microsoft to shut down a very useful compiler, like PHP.NET, that still compiles .NET code and runs on Windows perfectly. There is none.
And Microsoft understand that not all these guys that are going to be providing very useful tools for its Windows developer that adds to the value of running Windows are going to come from the Windows side of the world. I think you are still stuck in the 90's with your mentality about Microsoft.