Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Apr 2007 21:29 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 227639
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: I'll tell you why...did I miss smth. in history?
by fyysik on Wed 4th Apr 2007 23:48
in reply to "RE[2]: I'll tell you why..."
RE[4]: I'll tell you why...did I miss smth. in history?
by lucky13 on Thu 5th Apr 2007 00:00
in reply to "RE[3]: I'll tell you why...did I miss smth. in history?"
what means "giving away" - "for free?".
Yes, the limited PE. How many copies were downloaded or distributed before Be sold its assets?
If so, the deal failed in about 1996, and "free" BeOS saw the light in march/april 2000.
Like I wrote, AFTER the deal fell through. You have to remember the climate in the late '90s with venture capital flowing like crazy. Be's misfortune came when the tech bubble burst and the rivers of VC dried up -- which was about the same time the free PE was released. That wasn't enough to save the company because there just wasn't demand for its operating system.







Member since:
2007-04-01
Didn't Zeta sell more than BeOS originally did?
Hardly a measure of success given that Be started giving it away after the Apple deal fell through.
How much did that gross?
Not enough to justify continued development and sale, apparently.
Why didn't Palm or Access see any money? Where did the money go?
What money? You're equating sales with profit, and I don't think BeOS or Zeta were ever in the black. From everything I've been able to gather, Be was floating on venture capital and never came close to realizing a profit. I wouldn't expect Zeta to have fared any better.