Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Apr 2007 18:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 229273
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: This is why internet journalism isn't up to par
by Lobotomik on Wed 11th Apr 2007 07:08
in reply to "RE: This is why internet journalism isn't up to par"
Shame on you, Thom. That excuse is pathetic.
"Rumour has it" does not make good journalism, although it works fine in the pink press. "People say" is not usually news; what actually happens, is what should be news.
Your excuses are not only lame, but mendacious too; if the name of the article went somewhat like "Slashdot participants think OpenSUSE is hobbled by Microsoft Patents" then they those excuses may had holded (few) droplets of water. But then, of course, it would have looked a lot less interesting.
Shame, shame.
RE[3]: This is why internet journalism isn't up to par
by twenex on Wed 11th Apr 2007 07:24
in reply to "RE[2]: This is why internet journalism isn't up to par"





Member since:
2005-06-29
That's why I specifically said: "debate has risen over ClearType in Linux." I'm not giving any judgement, I do not say it's true, I just report "a" debate has risen over this issue.
And that is a factually correct statement. In other words, Slashdot may have been ignorant here, but OSN took the proper measures to make sure the item is about facts (namely, "a" debate has risen) instead of jumping to conclusions.