To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Debian's repositories have a much better selection of software.
I do not intend to start a distro flamewar, but people may be interested in the additional repositories that are available for CentOS:
http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories
For instance, the RPMForge repository provides a lot of high-quality add-on packages. It can be used fairly safely in conjunction with the yum priorities plugin, which allows you to protect from CentOS packages being upgraded with packages third party repositories:
http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities
... But with EPEL [1], it's RHEL/CentOS will reduce the gap considerably.
- Gilboa
[1] Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux is RHEL's "port" of Fedora's -extras.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/
"""
Debian's repositories have a much better selection of software.
"""
True. And that's a convenience if you need some really obscure packages.
On the other hand, CentOS5 has better administration tools, SELinux, Fortify_Source, Exec-Shield, Xen, a predictable release schedule of 18-24 months, and 7 years of support for every release.
For servers, there really is no comparison.
Edited 2007-04-13 10:00
I've read / heard nothing but great things about debian. (But let's not take this thread in some useless direction comparing the two.)
The point of the article is that there is a new major version release for CentOS. That's excellent news.
I started using CentOS at 4.4 as a file + print server and have been very happy with it. More recently I worked with our dba to build an Oracle rac on CentOS. If you don't have a RHEL budget and/or don't require the support, it is very handy.
Keep up the good work.
I'm a developer and I run CentOS on vmware because many of my customers use RHEL.
However, CentOS/RHEL isn't very good as a server distro. Here is a list of things that should be added:
- Bundle with real Java VM (not toy gcj). Not only Sun's, but also BEA's, which is specially optimized for server.
- Bundle with the full-stack JBoss app server instead of Tomcat.
- Provide a simple option to install without GUI and use web admin UI instead (webmin).
- Provide easy access/method to install commercial servers/dbs: Oracle, DB2, Sybase ASE, Sun's web server, BEA WebLogic, Zend Platform etc.
- Add some PHP cache extensions such as xcache or zend optimizer. That's a basic part for any LAMP env (and a flaw in php core)
Can't say anything about debian. I lost interest on it years ago since it always comes with very old apps and has some license-related annoyances (i'm not crazy about foss...)
Edited 2007-04-15 16:32
I understand you good intentions aquila..but what you are asking would break all sorts of rules, as well as provide a support nightmare for RHEL/CentOS teams.
- Bundle with real Java VM (not toy gcj). Not only Sun's, but also BEA's, which is specially optimized for server.
(now that java is open, maybe one day you can get regular java..so this one is a maybe)
- Bundle with the full-stack JBoss app server instead of Tomcat.
(Redhat makes money off support and commercial apps, why give away something that most people don't need. And the people who need it will want more than a quickie solution)
- Provide a simple option to install without GUI and use web admin UI instead (webmin).
(Just just dont check a desktop enviroment, or go with the minimal configuration which can install from one disc. CentOS is also good about releasing ServerCD which is a one disc install of only the server stuff)
- Provide easy access/method to install commercial servers/dbs: Oracle, DB2, Sybase ASE, Sun's web server, BEA WebLogic, Zend Platform etc.
(Again this is the companies job not Red Hat's. If they add it, they have to support it. It's like asking Microsoft to include one click install buttons in the menu for Oracle..not gonna happen, and does't make much sense)
- Add some PHP cache extensions such as xcache or zend optimizer. That's a basic part for any LAMP env (and a flaw in php core)
(more commercial software)
You really are just asking them to add a but f commercial software , some from competing companies, to their distro which doesn't make alot of sense on many levels.






Member since:
2006-11-16
bets are open!