Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 17th Apr 2007 22:12 UTC
BeOS & Derivatives Even more Haiku news today. Oliver Ruiz Dorantes, who will be monitoring GSoC student Salvatore Benedetto coming summer, has started work on what will become an office suite for Haiku. His blog already shows the first screenshots of the project. He is seeking for help on the project, so if you have the experience, feel free t help him out. Also, a new batch of icons has been added to Haiku.
Thread beginning with comment 232040
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Why not
by Richard-LA on Wed 18th Apr 2007 19:48 UTC in reply to "RE: Why not"
Richard-LA
Member since:
2007-04-17

Widespread adoption is a bad goal to have early on and very unrealistic; you end up trying to be all things to all people and get nowhere.

I hope the Haiku focus is to evolve to be the choice OS for a small and particular niche of professionals -- those developing media content, especially video content. It could be the OS of choice for indy film developers with just a few good apps.

Success breeds more success; find a niche and succeed, and other good things will follow.

Hats off to anyone willing to put time and energy into creating an app for Haiku; even if it doesn't finish, if there is a good design then objects from the source can be used elsewhere. It will be a good learning experience at the worst.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Why not
by lucky13 on Wed 18th Apr 2007 22:46 in reply to "RE[2]: Why not"
lucky13 Member since:
2007-04-01

Widespread adoption is a bad goal to have early on and very unrealistic; you end up trying to be all things to all people and get nowhere.

Being aloof by catering to the desires of a small group would also insure that its development (a) stagnates and (b) becomes so insular and narrow that outside interest can never develop. Worse, if it's too "quirky" or novel, it stands very little chance of being adopted outside its development group.

BeOS had the same goal with respect to media content you want Haiku to have. How'd that work out? Not so good last time I checked. Funny that.

Also, filmmakers don't live their lives in vacuums. Haiku shouldn't be developed in one. Focusing on too tight a niche can be as poor a strategy as being too broad. Then you might be better off talking about an application instead of an entire operating system. And with all due respect, you're moving your goalposts back years rather than forward considering how many open source, Windows, and Mac applications are already standards in filmmaking.

Hats off to anyone willing to put time and energy into creating an app for Haiku

Hats off to anyone creating apps for any OS, especially ones that can and will be used (not to mention that can and will be useful).

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: Why not
by Richard-LA on Thu 19th Apr 2007 01:38 in reply to "RE[3]: Why not"
Richard-LA Member since:
2007-04-17

Well, IMHO Be, Inc. failed because it didn't push hard enough on being a prime choice for media development, and it had a focus switch to being an Internet Appliance. Also, they went public which I think was a bad idea, and started their end.

I think comparing Be with Haiku doesn't work because Be's problem wasn't technology, but rather management decisions.

I don't accept the argument about "standards" in filmmaking, or anything. Plus all the indy filmmakers I know are pretty much living in a vaccuum, give them something better and they'll use it without question. Anyway, if one allowed standards to prevent developing new applications then we wouldn't get anywhere interesting.

Haiku will be the source of inspiration for people to write great software that sets new standards. Today's moaners and naysayers will thank the Haiku developers later on ;)

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Why not
by stestagg on Thu 19th Apr 2007 17:16 in reply to "RE[2]: Why not"
stestagg Member since:
2006-06-03

Widespread adoption is a bad goal to have early on and very unrealistic; you end up trying to be all things to all people and get nowhere.

- Quoth he without any ambition

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Why not
by StephenBeDoper on Mon 23rd Apr 2007 02:15 in reply to "RE[3]: Why not"
StephenBeDoper Member since:
2005-07-06

- Quoth he without any ambition


Impressive - you've managed to combine both Ad Hominem and the "Salesman's Close" tactic.

Reply Parent Score: 2