Linked by jayson.knight on Tue 1st May 2007 18:03 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 236295
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"The release for the DLR is done under the terms of the Microsoft Permissive License (MsPL) which is by all means an open source license. "
How does it interact with the GPL, LGPL, and MIT license that different parts of Mono is under? Also, I don't think the Microsoft Permissive License is certified by the OSI or the FSF or the DFSG. The FSF says that their shared source licenses are incompatible with the GPL.
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/
Edited 2007-05-01 22:56
The Microsoft Permissive License is described here:
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/sharedsource/licensingbasics/per...
I've seen it described as "BSD-like".
Edited 2007-05-01 23:08






Member since:
2005-07-06
Miguel de Icaza has an interesting blog entry:
http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2007/May-01.html
and
Nice