To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I'm sorry, what?
Being able to split a hard-disk into more than four partitions is definitely a feature, and one I want and use a lot. Where it came from doesn't matter -- it's there, and it's supported well in Windows and in Linux. But not BSD.
I wanted to try PC-BSD, and in fact downloaded and burned two CDs, before I ran into this very issue -- I had cleared out an extended partition, and the installer didn't want to know.
Rubbish.
Being able to split a hard-disk into more than four partitions is definitely a feature, and one I want and use a lot. Where it came from doesn't matter -- it's there, and it's supported well in Windows and in Linux. But not BSD.
You can have 4(primary partitions)*7(slices)=28 "partitions" with FreeBSD on your hard drive. How many you can have with Windows/Linux?
I had cleared out an extended partition, and the installer didn't want to know.
That was a bug that noone encountered during beta and RC testing- now it is fixed.
Extended partitions is *LAME*- end of story.
"Being able to split a hard-disk into more than four partitions is definitely a feature,"
It would have been even better if Compaq (yes, this is an abomination that MS is not responsible for) hadn't made the braindead design-decision to limit the number primary partitions to 4. Its a completely arbitrary and pointless limitation that does nothing but add unneeded complexity. That's what the previous poster was getting at.





Member since:
2006-07-15
The Microsoft way of doing things isn't a standard, it's just a lame attempt to mangle things so they fit in their idea of an "operating system". It's lame too playing the copycat to inferior "features".