"There are a myriad of both subtle and fundamental differences in the basic architecture of Windows Server 2008, which could dramatically change not only the way it's used in the enterprise, but also the logical and physical structure of networks where it's the dominant OS. The abilities to consolidate servers, to manage hardware more effectively, to remotely manage hardware without the graphical traffic, and to radically alter the system security model, could present a more compelling argument for customers to plan their WS2K8 migrations now, than the arguments for moving from Windows 2000 to Server 2003."
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: ...or moving to Linux
Member since:2005-07-06
Quite possibly because you were/are off topic? I was modded down, rather quickly I might add (;)), for being both an ass AND off topic. You were modded down for being off topic and possibly for showing your "contempt and disdain" for me being an ass to the other guy and not writing my comment like I was writing for a college English class.
The other dude was probably modded down for being a troll. He might not have been trolling, but when you mix a badly written comment, such as his, with what he was asking about Unix on a news article about a Windows server, well, it is going to get modded down.
Now, this comment will be modded -5 promptly, I'm sure, as it should be. I suggest we both just drop it and stay on topic. 
P.S.
Was this comment articulated well enough for you? *rolls eyes*
P.P.S.
Oh, I couldn't write a well done comment in Spanish. I remember very little of my Spanish from Highschool. . . Even though that was just 2 years ago. . . *sigh*
Edited 2007-05-29 21:45
Member since:
2006-01-03
Please, why don't you try to express yourself in Spanish the next time? Not that you seem the most articulate in English, either...
Edited 2007-05-28 22:01