Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 5th Jun 2007 19:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 245483
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links




Member since:
2006-11-08
Or why would you use Synaptic on a Debian-system when aptitude is the recommended frontend? Even the Debian-developers say so.
The only reasons I can see are:
- "apt-get install" is faster than "aptitude install"
- Synaptic (which uses apt-get) is more "bling" ;-)
- You don't care if you have lots of orphaned packages on your system (or don't mind to remove them manually)
- You don't want to learn how to use aptitude's ncurses-frontend.
Seriously, it's not like there isn't any update-notifier which can run aptitude instead of Synaptic...