Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 8th Jun 2007 15:01 UTC, submitted by AdministratorX
Thread beginning with comment 246341
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: could all this fuss be about
by sappyvcv on Fri 8th Jun 2007 18:52
in reply to "RE: could all this fuss be about"
RE[3]: could all this fuss be about
by ubit on Fri 8th Jun 2007 19:07
in reply to "RE[2]: could all this fuss be about"
Well that's what the article said they did.
"Microsoft introduced FAT in version 2.0 of MS-DOS in 1982, but was not granted patent '517 until 1996. Last year Redmond used it as the basis of its first ever licensing program, offering manufacturers the right to use the ubiquitous file system in return for a low royalty rate. At the time, Microsoft described this as "liberalization". Industry watchers noted how earlier in the year, Redmond had hired Marshall Phelps, the IBM attorney who in the Eighties, built up Big Blue's IP program from nothing into a multi-billion dollar business."




Member since:
2006-09-08
I thought that (long file name/fat) patent was knocked down in the US or Germany when MS tried to enforce it.
http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2004/09/30/microsoft_fat_patent_rejec...
"Microsoft's attempt to create a lucrative future revenue stream from its patent portfolio has tripped at the first hurdle. After an appeal, the US Patent Office has struck down Microsoft's '517 patent (USPTO 5,579, 517) on the FAT file system. Camera makers, amongst many other consumer electronics manufacturers, use the FAT file system on compact flash cards and other removable media."