Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 10th Jun 2007 22:38 UTC, submitted by Robert Kratky
Thread beginning with comment 246738
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Not really, it's the little guy who is at the biggest risk simply becuase a company like MS can afford a few lawsuits from patent trolls, the little guys usually just go out of business.
The patent trolls have business models built around the biggest return for minimal investment; when you're trolling a company like MS it's easy to find a high-powered law firm willing to take the case on contingency fees for a piece of the pie. They're less likely to if you're targetting a little guy with little capital, and if you have to pay your own bills then legal fees involved can outweigh any potential gain. Particularly since it would be difficult to prove damages owing from infringement by a small, independent ISV versus a large, well financed or well funded one with a much bigger market base.
So by that measure, the little guys are only at threat from the commercial patent holders who don't want their business threated. The patent trolls only target the low-hanging fruit in the hopes for a quick payout for minimal effort.




Member since:
2005-07-07
Not really, it's the little guy who is at the biggest risk simply becuase a company like MS can afford a few lawsuits from patent trolls, the little guys usually just go out of business.