OSNews > Thread > "RE[2]: Is that it ?" by John Nilsson

Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 15th Jun 2007 12:11 UTC

Earlier this year, Microsoft announced its upcoming Windows Home Server product; a sort of beefed up NAS based on Windows Server 2003 SP2. A few days ago, Microsoft released the first release candidate for Windows Home Server, and since I was admitted into the beta program, I downloaded this release and transformed my trusty desktop x86 into a Home Server.

0 · Read More · 101 Comment(s)

http://osne.ws/dyi

Thread beginning with comment 248194
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.

RE[2]: Is that it ?

by John Nilsson on Fri 15th Jun 2007 17:26 UTC in reply to "RE: Is that it ?"

Member since:
2005-07-06

Which doesn't say much though. The requirements for a _home_ server is completely different than what Server 2003 is designed for.

We are not talking MCSA here. The usability requirements to keep this secure and operational with only your typical home user as administrator is interesting to say the least.

Edited 2007-06-15 17:32

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[3]: Is that it ?

by flanque on Sat 16th Jun 2007 11:46 in reply to "RE[2]: Is that it ?"

Member since:
2005-12-15

That's why it has a simplified interface. They're building on top of a very good operating system, not trying to design it for an MCSA.

Maybe you should try it, then you'll be more informed.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[4]: Is that it ?

by John Nilsson on Sat 16th Jun 2007 14:22 in reply to "RE[3]: Is that it ?"

Member since:
2005-07-06

So they have a usable HTTP-server? I was under the impression that this was mainly focused on file-server and backup for the time being.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2