Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Tue 19th Jun 2007 19:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 249071
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Hey, I'm just a user.
And too many times have I heard things can't be done this way or that way.... that wont stop until somebody is really wrong and does it. -- don't shoot me!
OS is great at doing wonders, and some times these wonders need a tweek. The problem is that the user often has to be the one doing it. Kind of scares users away.





Member since:
2005-06-28
You are thinking very simplistically. Opera Mobile is NOT Opera Mini. Opera Mobile is a native app which can have hooks to the underlying Symbian functions. Opera Mini can't. More over, the N95 (which I also own), can do rotation itself, because Symbian supports it. Also, the N95 is over 320 Mhz and it has a kick-ass J2ME implementation (the best in the industry). You are in the minority, because most "cheap" phones are between 40 and 100 Mhz. Opera Mini must cater to them because this is where its main strength is: bringing the web on a low-ass phone.
Rotating a web page is somewhat costly, but the cost depends on 2 external factors:
-if the images aren't JPEG, or if they're JPEG but the JPEG decoder can't rotate while decoding, images are expensive to render.
-if the font engine can't rotate while drawing, text becomes expensive to render.
If images can be rotated for cheap/free, and if text-drawing is as speedy at 90 degrees is it is when straight, there's no performance difference at all.
I'd be very surprised if J2ME had such optimizations for image/text decoding. And IF there is ONE or TWO implementations of J2ME that can do that (or even worse, versions of specific implementations), the rest can't. So, the answer is "no", for at least a few more years.
Edited 2007-06-19 22:18