Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 24th Jun 2007 13:44 UTC
Graphics, User Interfaces Federkiel writes: "People working with Apple computers are used to a very consistent user experience. For a large part this stems from the fact that the Lisa type of GUI does not have the fight between MDI and SDI. The question simply never arises, because the Lisa type of GUI does not offer the choice to create either of both; it's something different all along. I usually think of it as 'MDI on steroids unified with a window manager'. It virtually includes all benefits of a SDI and and the benefits of an MDI." Read on for how I feel about this age-old discussion.
Thread beginning with comment 250391
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Interfaces...
by kramii on Mon 25th Jun 2007 09:07 UTC in reply to "Interfaces..."
kramii
Member since:
2005-07-22

>Gui design is entirely subjective.

Let's lay this myth to rest once and for all.

Imagine a GUI that is controlled by a mouse, but the mouse pointer moves in a random direction every time you move the mouse. Clearly, this would be bad for *everyone*.

A mouse-driven GUI where the pointer always moves in a consistent direction is, therefore, a demonstrably better design than a similar GUI where the pointer moves in a random direction.

Therefore, GUI design is not *entirely* subjective. There are at least *some* absolutes.

Of course, this does not mean that GUI design is not *partially* subjective.

Reply Parent Score: 3