Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 25th Jun 2007 20:40 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Privacy, Security, Encryption "I was somewhat surprised (but pleased) at the level of interest back when I published my Windows Vista - 90 Day Vulnerability Report. It was about the earliest span of time I thought might give us some indicators, and the indicators did look good. Six months is a much more interesting time frame, and gives us the opportunity to see if the early trend indicators are holding up, or if the early signs of progress were a short-term gain."
Thread beginning with comment 250477
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Meaningless "Report"
by Supreme Dragon on Mon 25th Jun 2007 21:38 UTC
Supreme Dragon
Member since:

This is just more "get the facts" FUD. I am sure there are countless vulnerabilities hidden in that bloated Vista code. A comparison of Linux and Vista code would be very amusing, but of course, MS would never show us that mess.

Reply Score: -3

RE: Meaningless "Report"
by jayson.knight on Mon 25th Jun 2007 22:06 in reply to "Meaningless "Report""
jayson.knight Member since:

Supreme Dragon, just for one day I'd love to see you try to eliminate the words "Vista" and "FUD" and "Pathetic (et al)" from your vocabulary. Better yet, just stop participating (and I use that word very loosely in this case) in Windows-centric threads period.

You can do it man...I have faith in you.

Edited 2007-06-25 22:07

Reply Parent Score: 5

v RE[2]: Meaningless "Report"
by Supreme Dragon on Mon 25th Jun 2007 22:26 in reply to "RE: Meaningless "Report""
RE: Meaningless "Report"
by flanque on Tue 26th Jun 2007 00:23 in reply to "Meaningless "Report""
flanque Member since:

Uh.. how can you be so sure? How do you know it's a mess? How do you know it's amusing? Please prove your assertion. I'm betting you cannot.

If anything, you're the one spreading FUD.

Reply Parent Score: 3

v RE[2]: Meaningless "Report"
by Supreme Dragon on Tue 26th Jun 2007 01:03 in reply to "RE: Meaningless "Report""