Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 5th Jul 2007 09:19 UTC
Original OSNews Interviews After interviewing Axel Dorfler yesterday, in this second installment of Five Questions, we interview Robert Szeleney, the main driving force behind SkyOS. SkyOS has been in development since the late '90s, but for the past few years, it has seen rapid development. Read on for Robert's answers to the Five Questions.
Thread beginning with comment 253139
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Looking forward.
by Almafeta on Thu 5th Jul 2007 14:17 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Looking forward."
Almafeta
Member since:
2007-02-22

As an open source application, SkyOS made less headway than even ReactOS.

As a closed source application, SkyOS has made more headway than that last four owners of Amiga combined.

Additionally, open-source inevitably means fragmentation, as forks lead to very similar but still incompatible versions of what otherwise would have been the same system.

Edited 2007-07-05 14:17

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

RE[6]: Looking forward.
by predictor on Thu 5th Jul 2007 14:32 in reply to "RE[5]: Looking forward."
predictor Member since:
2006-11-30

"As an open source application, SkyOS made less headway than even ReactOS. As a closed source application, SkyOS has made more headway than that last four owners of Amiga combined. "

That's because it was open source only EARLY in the process. In the same spirit, I can claim that Linux made less headway when it was closed (the first five months or so), and a LOT of headway when it was opened.

"Additionally, open-source inevitably means fragmentation, as forks lead to very similar but still incompatible versions of what otherwise would have been the same system."

Inevitably? Despite popular belief, there is only ONE Linux kernel, for instance (but many distributions - a different thing)

ReactOS and Haiku are not fragmented, and they have even designed rules to prevent it in the future.

If you really would like to prevent distributions and forks, then it's a matter of license design (don't know why you would want that - forks still means stuff gets done)

See? Your logic makes no sense.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5