Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 23rd Jul 2007 12:49 UTC, submitted by Captain Pirate
"We can read the Linspire-Microsoft patent agreement now, or more precisely Microsoft's 'Covenant to Customers', and I thought it would be worthwhile to give it a close, line-by-line reading. I'll explain it as best I can, but ask your lawyer if it matters to you in a real-world sense. For our purposes here, let's just have fun with the worst deal I've seen yet in this category."
Thread beginning with comment 257600
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2006-09-08
Why don't you three post your concerns (politely, with actual substance and proof-- of which you, Alfafeta and Sappy yet to show so far-- and without trolling) at Groklaw instead of going all ad hominem on everyone and PJ herself?
It says something about a person that attacks someone as not being real (from your post: <<because the so-called PJ >>) and yet then tries to speak about bias at a site. For example, I could say that you three are employed by Microsoft or their business partners, from reading your comments here, but that would not be productive.
Here's a read of the Groklaw comment policy and mission statement. Seems very unbiased to me but I've just been reading there since the start of this year. When attacks on _SCO_ aren't allowed, you know there's something special about a place.
http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=2004030120301285 Comment Policy
http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=20040923045054130 Mission statement
Edited 2007-07-23 22:46